Potential of damage associated molecular patterns in synergising radiation and the immune response in oesophageal cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an intimate crosstalk between cancer formation, dissemination, treatment response and the host immune system, with inducing tumour cell death the ultimate therapeutic goal for most anti-cancer treatments. However, inducing a purposeful synergistic response between conventional therapies and the immune system remains evasive. The release of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) is indicative of immunogenic cell death and propagation of established immune responses. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the importance of DAMP expression in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) or by immune cells themselves. AIM: To investigate the effects of conventional therapies on DAMP expression and to determine whether OAC is an immunogenic cancer. METHODS: = 9) both pre and post-treatment with clinically relevant chemo(radio)therapeutics. RESULTS: . Significantly increased frequencies of T cell DAMP expression in OAC patients were observed following chemo(radio)therapy, which was significantly higher in tumour tissue compared with peripheral blood. Patients with high expression of HMGB1 had a significantly better tumour regression grade (TRG 1-2) compared to low expressors. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, OAC expresses an immunogenic phenotype with two distinct subgroups of high and low DAMP expressors, which correlated with tumour regression grade and lymphatic invasion. It also identifies DAMPs namely CRT and HMGB1 as potential promising biomarkers in predicting good pathological responses to conventional chemo(radio)therapies currently used in the multimodal management of locally advanced disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".