MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385719746 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3226159/v1

Deciphering the differential expression patterns of yield-related negative regulators in hexaploid wheat and F1 hybrids at different growth stages

2023· preprint· en· W4385719746 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Muhammad Jawad Akbar Awan, Muhammad Awais Farooq, Rubab Zahra Naqvi, Umer Karamat, Sayyad Ali Raza Bukhari, Muhammad Abu Bakar Waqas, Muhammad Arslan Mahmood, Muhammad Ismail Buzdar, Awais Rasheed, Imran Amin, Nasir A. Saeed, Shahid Mansoor

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Agricultural Research Institute
KeywordsBiologyPolyploidHybridCultivarHeterosisGeneGeneticsGene duplicationGene expressionNeofunctionalizationAllelePloidyEvolutionary biologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Being a major source of protein and calories in the human diet, bread wheat is cultivated worldwide, and its yield is showing dwindling notion due to various environmental challenges. Hexaploid bread wheat underwent a series of polyploidization events through interspecific hybridizations that conferred adaptive plasticity and resulted in duplication and neofunctionalization of major agronomic genes. Interestingly the genetic architecture of polyploid wheat not only confers adaptive plasticity but also offers huge genetic diversity. However, the contribution of different gene copies (homeologs) encoded from different subgenomes (A, B, D) at different growth stages remained unexplored. In this study, we assessed the differential expression profiles of yield-related negative regulators in elite cultivars of wheat and their F1 hybrids and identified various cis-regulatory signatures that might influence these expression patterns. Furthermore, the differential and preferential expression patterns of the homeologs showed dynamic expression profiles of A, B, and D subgenomes at six different growth stages, portraying the different homeolog-dominance at the same stage in the different cultivars and their F1 hybrids. Based on the expression profiling, hybrid progenies of elite cultivars were developed that showed better heterosis such as up to 17% increase in the average number of grains and up to 50% increase in average thousand grains weight as compared to mid-parents and the F2 segregating populations demonstrated varying yields from high-yielding parents. These results suggest the significance of dynamic transcriptional expression patterns and the regulatory signatures of major genes that can substantially contribute and provide insights for the selective introduction of better cultivars into hybrid breeding programs which can be harnessed for the improvement of future wheat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→French-language works237,207→