MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385722698 · doi:10.5070/p9401057774

Revision of northeast Pacific Paleogene cypraeoidean gastropods (Mollusca), including recognition of three new species: Implications for paleobiogeographic distribution and faunal turnover

2023· article· en· W4385722698 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lindsey T. Groves, Richard L. Squires

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoBios · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California Museum of PaleontologyCalifornia Sea Grant, University of California, San DiegoUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBurke Museum, University of WashingtonAcademy of Natural Sciences of Drexel UniversityMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsFaunaGenusPaleogeneTaxonomy (biology)PaleontologyTaxonVicarianceEcologyGeologyGeographyBiologyPhylogenetic tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Paleogene cypraeoidean fauna of the northeast Pacific region (NEP), extending from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada southward to Baja California Sur, México, consists of 12 genera, 20 named species (three of which are new), six open-nomenclature species, one Cypraeidae, indeterminate to genus and species, one cf. species, and four nomina dubia. All taxa are figured here. Species reassigned at the genus level are Protocypraea ? simiensis (Nelson, 1925) and Luponovula maniobraensis (Squires and Advocate, 1986). Improved documentation of known NEP species include Propustularia kemperae (Nelson, 1925), Grovesia castacensis (Stewart, 1926) [1927]), G. mathewsonii (Gabb, 1864), and Eratotrivia crescentensis (Weaver and Palmer, 1922). The three new species, Subepona leahae , Bernaya kaylinae , and Eocypraea judithsmithae are from the upper lower Eocene Llajas Formation of Simi Valley, Ventura County and Devil Canyon, Los Angeles County, California. Six open-nomenclature species need better preserved material; they are: Bernaya sp., two Protocypraea ? sp., Gisortia sp., Eocypraea sp., and Cypraedia sp., as does an indeterminate cypraeid from the Lodo Formation of central California. Nomina dubia are “ Bernaya ” fresnoensis (Anderson, 1905), “ Eocypraea ” bayerquei (Gabb, 1864), “ Sphaerocypraea ” martini (Dickerson, 1914), and “ Sulcocypraea ” oakvillensis (Van Winkle, 1918). Eratotrivia mackini (Durham, 1944) is herein reassigned to the synonymy of Grovesia mathewsonii (Gabb, 1869). The NEP Paleocene cypraeoidean fauna consists of four genera, a cypraeid of unknown generic affinity, and two nomina dubia. The early Eocene “Capay Stage” cypraeoidean fauna is comprised of eight genera and two nomina dubia. That was during the peak of NEP cypraeoidean biodiversity, which coincided with the “Early Eocene Climate Optimum” (EECO), the warmest time of the Paleogene. At the end of “Capay” time, biodiversity abruptly decreased, and this trend continued to the end of “Domengine Stage” time, when a faunal turnover took place. The cypraeoidean faunas in the subsequent “Tejon Stage” and Galvinian Stage continued to be diminished because of the ongoing cooling of the ocean waters. Continued global cooling eventually caused the disappearance of the thermophilic Paleogene NEP cypraeoideans before the beginning of the Oligocene. Most of the NEP cypraeoidean fauna is very similar morphologically to species found in the Tethys region of Europe, especially France, Italy, and Ukraine. These similar species are indicative that the introduction of most of the NEP cyraeoidean genera into the NEP region was via a westward-directed, warm-water current originating in the ancient Tethys Sea region of western Europe. The point of origin of the Paleocene Propustularia is unknown, and the late Eocene Nuceolaria most likely arrived in the NEP region via a Pacific Ocean route.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleoBiosSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207