Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is an adaptation of La Répression des homosexuels au Québec et en France, published by Les éditions du Septentrion in 2006.That work, in turn, was adapted from my doctoral dissertation on the sociology of law, completed in 2003 at Université Picardie Jules Verne, in France, and Université Laval, in Quebec.Since then, much research has been published addressing different facets of the subjects analyzed in this book.Therefore, this version has been updated with more than thirty new references.Moreover, my continuing work on homophobia and repression of homosexuality, which I began in 1998, has enabled me to clarify and refine my socio-historical reading of the evolution of criminal law in terms of its management of homosexuality.It is important for readers to understand that this book is a sociological and criminological study of the judicial handling of homosexuality in Quebec and France over the past four hundred years, not a historical study of homosexuality per se.Indeed, it would be both risky and pretentious for me to claim to have painted an accurate and nuanced portrait of the many realities experienced by gays over such a long historical period.The contribution of my analysis is a better understanding of the legislative changes that have occurred in Quebec and France with regard to the social reaction to homosexuality -a contribution derived from my interpretation of both primary sources (for example, archives, jurisprudence, criminal statistics) and secondary sources (for example, theological research, medical treatises).The primary objective of this research is thus to conduct a sociohistorical analysis of the different dominant discourses (religious, medical, human rights) that have influenced how criminal law managed and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.516 | 0.261 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".