MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385741990 · doi:10.17816/rjpbr115953

The role of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in the formation of hypertrophic skin scars with the use of a pulsed dye laser and Fermencol phonophoresis

2022· article· en· W4385741990 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina V. Ismailyan, Sergey N. Nagornev, Larisa V. Kruglova, В. К. Фролков

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Physiotherapy Balneology and Rehabilitation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonophoresisMatrix metalloproteinaseScarsMedicineExtracellular matrixHypertrophic scarCollagenaseSurgeryInternal medicineUltrasoundChemistryEnzymeRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: An imbalance between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression and tissue inhibitors of MMP is considered as a possible mechanism for impaired collagen synthesis and degradation, which leads to the development of hypertrophic scars. The use of a vascular laser, in particular a pulsed dye laser, leads to coagulation of the vascular locus that feeds the hypertrophic skin scar, resulting in a decrease in extracellular matrix synthesis. The use of collagenase phonophoresis increases the effectiveness of laser therapy due to the destruction of the extracellular matrix. AIM: To study the role of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in the pathogenesis of immature hypertrophic skin scars and to evaluate the dynamics of enzymes during the combined use of a pulsed dye laser and Fermenkol phonophoresis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed with the participation of 125 patients aged 22 to 55 years with immature (up to 6 months) hypertrophic skin scars. All patients were divided into 4 groups according to the simple fixed randomization procedure. The first group (control, n=32) received course local compression therapy using silicone plates for 2 months. The second group (main group I, n=31) underwent two courses of Fermencol phonophoresis (5 daily procedures lasting 10 minutes each with a break of 34 weeks). The third group (main group II, n=31) underwent two pulsed dye laser procedures with an interval of 4 weeks. The fourth group (main III, n=31) received complex treatment, which included a combination of two pulsed dye laser procedures and two cycles of Fermenkol phonophoresis. The study of the clinical condition of patients was carried out according to the modified Vancouver scar scale (VSS). The content of MMP and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in blood serum was determined by enzyme immunoassay. Patients were examined twice: before the start and 2 weeks after the end of the course of treatment. To form a sample of reference values of MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), a group of 20 somatically healthy individuals was used. RESULTS: Initially reduced levels of MMP-1 and MMP-9 were found in the blood serum of patients with immature hypertrophic skin scars, with high values of TIMP-1, which allows us to consider reduced expression as an important link in the pathogenesis of the fibroproliferative process in the skin, which causes excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components. The use of pulsed dye laser in combination with Fermencol phonophoresis was accompanied by an increase in the content of MMP in the blood serum of patients with immature hypertrophic skin scars, which positively correlated with the severity of the clinical result of treatment, assessed by VSS. CONCLUSION: A conclusion was made about the clinical and pathogenetic significance of MMPs and TIMPs in the development of fibroplastic processes, which allows us to consider these biochemical parameters as informative criteria for the effectiveness of the therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Physiotherapy Balneology and RehabilitationSame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207