MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385756448 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2023.3299955

A Two-Channel Time-Interleaved Continuous-Time Third-Order CIFF-Based Delta-Sigma Modulator

2023· article· en· W4385756448 on OpenAlexaff
Yue Hu, Yuekai Liu, Xinyu Qin, Yan Liu, Mingqiang Guo, Sai‐Weng Sin, Guoxing Wang, Yong Lian, Liang Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpurious-free dynamic rangeDelta-sigma modulationIntegratorFeed forwardDynamic rangeChannel (broadcasting)Figure of meritElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work introduces a two-channel time-interleaved (TI) continuous-time (CT) 3rd-order delta-sigma modulator (DSM). It uses the information from one complete channel to predict the other channel based on the extrapolation principle. Note that, Cascaded Integrator of Distributed Feedforward (CIFF) topology is selected for the loop filter for the following reasons: 1) it could reduce the number of required feedback DACs as much as possible; 2) it allows to implement the zero optimization for the TI DSM such that the performance could be further improved. Furthermore, we employ the technique of error correction to address the issue regarding the delay-free feedback path, which originates from the extrapolating TI DSM. We present the derivations of the target TI CT DSM starting from a single-channel discrete-time (DT) DSM, while the compensation for excess loop delay (ELD) is considered. Fabricated in 65nm CMOS process, this modulator achieves an equivalent output sampling rate of 800MS/s, while the analog channel operates at 400MHz. It exhibits a signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SNDR) /spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR)/dynamic range (DR) of 75.5dB/89.7dB/79dB over a 10MHz bandwidth. The total power consumption is 33.73mW from 1.2v/1.8v power supplies. It results in a Schreier Figure of Merit (FoM) of 163.7dB based on DR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207