MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385767016 · doi:10.1007/s10008-023-05624-5

Modelling diffusion controlled electro-deoxidation of metal oxide to metal in molten salt

2023· article· en· W4385767016 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Osarinmwian, Edward P.L. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid State Electrochemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsMolten saltOxideDiffusionDrop (telecommunication)Exchange current densityThermodynamicsElectrolyteOverpotentialElectrochemistryCathodeMetalChemistryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Diffusion is a fundamental irreversible process intervening in the evolution of many out-of-equilibrium systems and is successfully described by Fick’s law obtained from non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Despite this, numerical simulations of solid state electro-deoxidation in the diffusion-controlled regime in molten salt remain elusive. Here, a new model for diffusion controlled three-phase interline (3PI) penetration in a porous cathode during electro-deoxidation is validated against experimental observation. This penetrating 3PI model is applied at high overpotential and benchmarked using the oxygen ionisation TiO 2 (s) + 4e − → Ti(s) + 2O 2− at the 3PI. The model couples slow diffusive transport and fast oxygen ionisation while assuming a negligible ohmic potential drop in bulk molten CaCl 2 electrolyte. The 14 nm s −1 penetration rate of the 3PI and the order of magnitude of 3PI currents (derived from an exchange current density and cathodic transfer coefficient of 0.32 A cm −2 and 0.01, respectively) in the chronoamperometric data for porous cathodes are in good agreement with experimental observation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid State ElectrochemistrySame topicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processesFrench-language works237,207