Evaluation of Mimesys® Phosphorylcholine (PC)-Coated Oxygenators during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new generation of coating extracorporeal circuitry with biocompatible polymers has entered the North American perfusion market. This new biomimetic coating process uses synthetic phosphorylcholine (PC) containing polymers to bond covalently to the surface of the Sorin Monolyth® oxygenator, under the brand name of Mimesys®. In part one of a three-part investigation, 160 Mimesys®-coated oxygenators were randomly evaluated against 36 uncoated oxygenators for blood flow, hemodynamic resistance, and pressure differentials. In part two, retrospective analysis of platelet data collected in this study was compared with platelet data collected from a previous investigation using uncoated Monolyth oxygenators with albumin and crystalloid perfusates. Part three examined the risk-adjusted oxygenators, compared with 71 case-matched patients treated with uncoated oxygenators. There was no difference found in the Mimesys-coated group, when compared to the control group, with regard to pressure differentials or hemodynamic resistance. However, we conclude that platelet protection with PC-coated Monolyth’s using crystalloid perfusates, was similar to platelet protection with albumin perfusates, and significantly better than uncoated Monolyths® using crystalloid perfusates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".