MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385778756 · doi:10.1080/14760584.2023.2245890

Sporozoite immunization: innovative translational science to support the fight against malaria

2023· review· en· W4385778756 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas L. Richie, L. W. Preston Church, Tooba Murshedkar, Peter F. Billingsley, Eric R. James, Mei‐Chun Chen, Yonas Abebe, Natasha KC, Sumana Chakravarty, David Dolberg, Sara A. Healy, Halimatou Diawara, Mahamadou S. Sissoko, Issaka Sagara, David M. Cook, Judith E. Epstein, Benjamin Mordmüller, Melissa C. Kapulu, Andrea Kreidenweiss, Blandine Franke‐Fayard, Sélidji Todagbé Agnandji, María-Silvia A. López Mikue, Matthew B. B. McCall, Laura C. Steinhardt, Martina Oneko, Ally Olotu, Ashley M. Vaughan, James G. Kublin, Sean C. Murphy, Said Jongo, Marcel Tanner, Sodiomon B. Sirima, Matthew B. Laurens, Claudia Daubenberger, Joana C. Silva, Kirsten E. Lyke, Chris J. Janse, Meta Roestenberg, Robert W. Sauerwein, Salim Abdulla, Alassane Dicko, Stefan H. I. Kappe, B. Kim Lee Sim, Patrick E. Duffy, Peter G. Kremsner, Stephen L. Hoffman

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Vaccines · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumElse Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungNaval Medical Research CenterCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRadboud UniversiteitUniversiteit LeidenLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumEberhard Karls Universität TübingenEuropean CommissionKaiser PermanenteDeutsches Zentrum für InfektionsforschungUniversity of OxfordKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research InstituteHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeUniversitas IndonesiaWellcome Trust
KeywordsJavaScriptMalariaComputer scienceImmunizationZoomVirologyFeature (linguistics)Computational biologyBiologyImmunologyProgramming languageAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: (Pf), the deadliest human malaria parasite. AREAS COVERED: mosquitoes to humans, are the only vaccine immunogen achieving >90% efficacy against Pf infection. This review describes >30 clinical trials of PfSPZ vaccines in the U.S.A., Europe, Africa, and Asia, based on first-hand knowledge of the trials and PubMed searches of 'sporozoites,' 'malaria,' and 'vaccines.' EXPERT OPINION: First generation (radiation-attenuated) PfSPZ vaccines are safe, well tolerated, 80-100% efficacious against homologous controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) and provide 18-19 months protection without boosting in Africa. Second generation chemo-attenuated PfSPZ are more potent, 100% efficacious against stringent heterologous (variant strain) CHMI, but require a co-administered drug, raising safety concerns. Third generation, late liver stage-arresting, replication competent (LARC), genetically-attenuated PfSPZ are expected to be both safe and highly efficacious. Overall, PfSPZ vaccines meet safety, tolerability, and efficacy requirements for protecting pregnant women and travelers exposed to Pf in Africa, with licensure for these populations possible within 5 years. Protecting children and mass vaccination programs to block transmission and eliminate malaria are long-term objectives. Introduction Malaria, a devastating febrile illness caused by protozoan parasites, sickened 247,000,000 people in 2021 and killed 619,000, mostly children and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. A highly effective vaccine is urgently needed, especially for Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the deadliest human malaria parasite. Areas covered Sporozoites (SPZ), the parasite stage transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes to humans, are the only vaccine immunogen achieving >90% efficacy against Pf infection. This review describes >30 clinical trials of PfSPZ vaccines in the U.S.A., Europe, Africa, and Asia, based on first-hand knowledge of the trials and PubMed searches of ‘sporozoites,’ ‘malaria,’ and ‘vaccines.’ Expert opinion First generation (radiation-attenuated) PfSPZ vaccines are safe, well tolerated, 80–100% efficacious against homologous controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) and provide 18–19 months protection without boosting in Africa. Second generation chemo-attenuated PfSPZ are more potent, 100% efficacious against stringent heterologous (variant strain) CHMI, but require a co-administered drug, raising safety concerns. Third generation, late liver stage-arresting, replication competent (LARC), genetically-attenuated PfSPZ are expected to be both safe and highly efficacious. Overall, PfSPZ vaccines meet safety, tolerability, and efficacy requirements for protecting pregnant women and travelers exposed to Pf in Africa, with licensure for these populations possible within 5 years. Protecting children and mass vaccination programs to block transmission and eliminate malaria are long-term objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of VaccinesSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207