Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Part I Chapter 6, I interviewed Her Excellency, Josefina de la Caridad Vidal Ferreiro, when she was the Cuban Ambassador to Canada. This chapter illuminates role of Cuban women in government and society, sharing some interesting perspectives on the lives of women in her country. We also discussed economic development, politics—in terms of Helms–Burton Title III, foreign investment, and shared a little about her personal life and career. Our interview took place in late January 2019 at the Embassy of Cuba in Ottawa. Also in our conversation, the Ambassador explains that although women played a role in earlier revolutions historically; it was not until the Cuban Revolution of 1959 that women achieved their potential. The reason for this was the recognition by the leader of the Revolution, Fidel Castro, that women were “a revolution within the revolution.” He said, without women, this revolution would not have been possible. After the Revolution, women entered the workforce, acquired education and literacy, achieved economic independence, autonomy, to play an active role in Cuban society. In politics, women have fared well. Cuba places second in the world for the highest percentage of women in parliament, next to Rwanda. Of the total seats in Parliament, women hold 53.2%. Other issues discussed in this interview include social problems, literacy, the Family Code, and the prominent role of the Federation of Women organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".