Storytelling, Visual and Cognitive Mapping and Photoatlassing of Indigenous Elder William Commanda’s Canoe Journey: Art, Craft, Motion, Experience, Knowledge and Wisdom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This presentation examines the importance of the motif of the Indigenous canoe in the integration of art, craft, cybernetic and cognitive cartography, ecology, movement, epistemology and relationality in the life and work of North American Indigenous Elder William Commanda, founder of the Circle of All Nations. A world-renowned canoe builder and environmentalist, Law of Nature preoccupations featured in his life-long exploration of canoe as material object and epistemological methodological tool, to present ephemeral Indigenous relational and bridge building knowledge and wisdom. His formal outreach to the mainstream world of North America is documented in a 1960s video of the Smithsonian Institute; in Denmark, in commemorative photo/teaching books at the Roskilde Museum and, at age 90, in the Good Enough for Two canoe-making documentary (2006). Today, there is an explosion of interest in the canoe in school and museum settings in Canada, and the spatial and temporal significance of this iconic emblem utilizes and is complemented by semiotic Photoatlas orientation and analysis (after Wolodtschenko).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".