MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385793030 · doi:10.22219/cognicia.v11i1.26176

Peran dukungan sosial dalam menghadapi fase quarter life crisis dewasa awal penyandang disabilitas fisik

2023· article· en· W4385793030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Azwa Salsabila Anggraeni, Udi Rosida Hijrianti

Bibliographic record

VenueCognicia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyFeelingQuarter (Canadian coin)AnxietyNonprobability samplingSocial supportDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologySocial psychologyPsychiatryPopulationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early adulthood is a time when individuals will experience complex developmental problems related to the role of adults and the underlying psychological processes. Persons with disabilities are someone who experiences physical or sensory limitations for a long time, called physical limitations if the individual loses (all or part) his body functions motorly, activities such as fine motor skills, talking, walking, hand movements and so on. At this time individuals will tend to have negative feelings such as feelings of uncertainty, anxiety, anxiety, and frustration which is usually called the quarter life crisis phase. Social support is a feeling of comfort, attention, and assistance received by individuals from other individuals. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of social support and quarter life crisis on early adults with disabilities. This study used a descriptive quantitative technique on 102 participants. The research subjects were taken using a purposive sampling technique with the criteria for early adulthood persons with physical disabilities, male or female, aged 18-25 years. The instruments in this study consisted of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the Quarter Life Crisis Scale. The results showed that there was an effect of social support on quarter life crises in early adulthood with disabilities (r = .053; p = .020 <.05). Keywords: Early adulthood, quarter life crisis, physical disabilities, social support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCogniciaSame topicChild Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207