Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the saying goes, sometimes less is more – and when it comes to neural networks, that couldn’t be more true. Enter pruning, the art of selectively trimming away unnecessary parts of a network to create a more streamlined, efficient architecture. In this paper, we introduce a novel end-to-end pipeline for model pruning via the frequency domain. This work aims to shed light on the interoperability of intermediate model outputs and their significance beyond the spatial domain. Our method, dubbed Common Frequency Domain Pruning (CFDP) aims to extrapolate common frequency characteristics defined over the feature maps to rank the individual channels of a layer based on their level of importance in learning the representation. By harnessing the power of CFDP, we have achieved state-of-the-art results on CIFAR-10 with GoogLeNet reaching an accuracy of 95.25%, that is, +0.2% from the original model. We also outperform all benchmarks and match the original model’s performance on ImageNet, using only 55% of the trainable parameters and 60% of the FLOPs. In addition to notable performances, models produced via CFDP exhibit robustness to a variety of configurations including pruning from untrained neural architectures, and resistance to adversarial attacks. The implementation code can be found at https://github.com/Skhaki18/CFDP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it