MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385812885 · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10282-5

Educational design research: grappling with methodological fit

2023· article· en· W4385812885 on OpenAlexaff
Michele Jacobsen, Susan McKenney

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Technology Research and Development · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance (law)Educational researchEducational technologyField (mathematics)Engineering ethicsFocus (optics)Computer scienceManagement scienceInstructional designResearch designResearch methodologyPsychological interventionSociologyData sciencePsychologyPedagogySocial scienceMultimediaEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.737
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.798
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.7370.798
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0180.008
Science and technology studies0.0120.085
Scholarly communication0.0260.031
Open science0.0120.024
Research integrity0.0200.030
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.779
GPT teacher head0.623
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEducational Technology Research and DevelopmentSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207