MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385820070 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2023.3305000

Switch Open-Circuit Fault Detection and Localization for Modular Multilevel Converters Based on Signal Synthesis

2023· article· en· W4385820070 on OpenAlexafffund
Haoran Wang, Yuan Li, Anjana Wijesekera, Gregory J. Kish, Qing Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Electric System Operator
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Modular designConvertersComputer scienceFault detection and isolationWaveformVoltageElectronic engineeringCapacitorControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The open-circuit fault detection and localization (FDL) scheme plays a significant role in improving the reliability of modular multilevel converters (MMCs). This article presents a simplified signal synthesis-based FDL scheme with good generality and robustness. The proposed FDL scheme exploits the characteristics that the capacitor voltages of faulty submodules (SMs) have different patterns and higher values than those of healthy ones. Based on this knowledge, certain signature voltage signals are selected, and waveforms consisting of such signatures are reconstructed by the signal synthesis technique to detect and localize the fault. The proposed scheme is suitable for both low- and high-voltage MMCs since the computational complexity does not change with the number of SMs. The scheme does not rely on system parameters, which makes it immune to parameter uncertainties, and there is no need for any additional sensors. Both single and simultaneous multiple faults can be handled with the proposed scheme. Simulation and experimental results validate that the proposed approach based on the signal synthesis method can effectively detect and localize the fault accurately under different loading conditions and has robustness against load change and circuit parameter uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207