Folate deficiency increases the incidence of dolutegravir-associated foetal defects in a mouse pregnancy model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG) is a recommended first-line regimen for all people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Initial findings from Botswana, a country with no folate fortification program, showed an elevated prevalence of neural tube defects (NTDs) with peri-conceptional exposure to DTG. Here we explore whether a low folate diet influences the risk of DTG-associated foetal anomalies in a mouse model. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice fed a folate-deficient diet for 2 weeks, were mated and then randomly allocated to control (water), or 1xDTG (2.5 mg/kg), or 5xDTG (12.5 mg/kg) both administered orally with 50 mg/kg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 33.3 mg/kg emtricitabine. Treatment was administered once daily from gestational day (GD) 0.5 to sacrifice (GD15.5). Foetuses were assessed for gross anomalies. Maternal and foetal folate levels were quantified. FINDINGS: 313 litters (103 control, 106 1xDTG, 104 5xDTG) were assessed. Viability, placental weight, and foetal weight did not differ between groups. NTDs were only observed in the DTG groups (litter rate: 0% control; 1.0% 1xDTG; 1.3% 5xDTG). Tail, abdominal wall, limb, craniofacial, and bleeding defects all occurred at higher rates in the DTG groups versus control. Compared with our previous findings on DTG usage in folate-replete mouse pregnancies, folate deficiency was associated with higher rates of several defects, including NTDs, but in the DTG groups only. We observed a severe left-right asymmetry phenotype that was more frequent in DTG groups than controls. INTERPRETATION: Maternal folate deficiency may increase the risk for DTG-associated foetal defects. Periconceptional folic acid supplementation could be considered for women with HIV taking DTG during pregnancy, particularly in countries lacking folate fortification programs. FUNDING: This project has been funded by Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN275201800001I and award #R01HD104553. LS is supported by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Maternal-Child Health and HIV. HM is supported by a Junior Investigator award from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".