MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Partitioning Algorithm Based-on Vertex-degree of Undirected Graph for VLSI Circuit Simulations

2023· article· en· W4385831788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bo Ouyang, Lei‐Lei Qiu, Congnwei Liao, Tianyi Yan, Hongjian Li, Lianwen Deng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationGraph partitionAdjacency listPartition (number theory)AlgorithmComputer scienceElectronic circuitVertex (graph theory)Cluster analysisBreadth-first searchUndirected graphGraphMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A gate-level partitioning algorithm based on vertex-degree of undirected graph is proposed for parallel simulation of very large-scale integrate (VLSI) circuit in this paper. Both the inner-and outer vertex-degrees of the undirected graph are used for VLSI circuits division, then the interconnections between the partition modules are then minimized. Furthermore, clustering using adjacency relation between the partitions is completed for balanced loadings among modules. Performances of the proposed and conventional partition algorithms, including the Deep-First-Search(i.e. DFS) algorithm and Metis partition tool, were evaluated in terms of the minimum cut set, module loading balance and partition time consumption, respectively. Algorithm implementations of 66- gates to 5743- gates circuits, show that the proposed algorithm renders a decrease of the minimum edge cut number by 51.1% and 5.9 %, compared with the DFS algorithm and the Metis partition, respectively. In addition, the average time consumption of the proposed algorithm is reduced by 44.9%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207