MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385832195 · doi:10.1109/tap.2023.3304026

Frequency-Diverse Metacavity Cassegrain Antenna for Differential Coincidence Imaging

2023· article· en· W4385832195 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mengran Zhao, Shitao Zhu, D. Lynch, Yiheng Nian, Thomas Fromentèze, Mohsen Khalily, Xiaoming Chen, Vincent Fusco, Okan Yurduseven

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaQueen's UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaQueen's University BelfastLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsCassegrain antennaReflector (photography)OpticsAntenna (radio)PhysicsCassegrain reflectorRadiation patternCoincidencePhase (matter)Computer sciencePeriscope antennaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to solve the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) problem of the differential coincidence imaging (DCI) system, a frequency-diverse metacavity Cassegrain antenna (FDMCA) that is able to generate low-correlated bunching radiation patterns is proposed in this communication. The FDMCA is designed according to the Cassegrain antenna form, which consists of a frequency-diverse half-spherical metacavity etched with backprojecting slot arrays and a parabolic reflector. In total, 81 useful measurement modes with a bunching angle of 40° are obtained from 32 to 36 GHz. First, frequency-diverse field distributions in the metacavity are obtained utilizing a high-dispersion metasurface. Backprojecting slot arrays etched on the metacavity would couple the energy from the metacavity and backradiate to the reflector. When placing the phase center of the feed source at the reflector focal point, the reflected patterns would be focused. Then, the performance of the proposed FDMCA is evaluated. In total, 81 radiation patterns with correlation coefficients (CCs) under 0.3 are generated. Finally, imaging experiments using the proposed FDMCA are carried out and the target image is reconstructed successfully using the DCI method. Comparative experiments are also implemented under the same conditions using a nonbunching frequency-diverse metasurface antenna (FDMA) to verify the bunching advantage of the FDMCA. The design is validated by simulations and measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207