MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385833674 · doi:10.34119/bjhrv6n4-230

Fístula pieloduodenal com evolução para obstrução duodenal por pielonefrite crônica - relato de caso e revisão da literatura

2023· article· pt· W4385833674 on OpenAlexaff
Lívia Roberta Costa Do Nascimento, Antônio Marcial Pinheiro De Alencar, Carlos Eduardo Soares Macedo, Luiz Henrique de Andrade Araújo, Álvaro Antônio Bandeira Ferraz, Rodrigo Alves Ataíde

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Health Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicBiliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fístula pieloduodenal está associada a complicações de doenças do trato urológico, sendo a pielonefrite crônica por nefrolitíase a causa mais comum desta rara patologia. Será reportado a história clínica com exames diagnósticos, intervenção cirúrgica e manejo pós-operatório de uma paciente do sexo feminino, 55 anos, com quadro de obstrução duodenal por pielonefrite crônica em rim direito associado a fístula pieloduodenal de longa data, diagnosticado por tomografia computadorizada e endoscopia digestiva alta. Foi submetida a nefrectomia direita total e duodenorrafia no mesmo tempo cirúrgico, evoluiu com fístula e subestenose duodenal sendo indicado tratamento endoscópico à vácuo e dilatação endoscópica com balão, com resolução de ambas as complicações. Realizada revisão da literatura para discutir etiologias, apresentações, diferenças e semelhanças com casos relacionados ao manejo das fístulas pieloduodenais. Este relato ressalta a importância da multidisciplinaridade na abordagem diagnóstica e terapêutica de uma patologia grave e rara.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Health ReviewSame topicBiliary and Gastrointestinal FistulasFrench-language works237,207