MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385834496 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3305384

Transformer-Based Spatio-Temporal Analysis for Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity From Echocardiography Cine Series

2023· article· en· W4385834496 on OpenAlexafffund
Naser Ahmadi, Michael Tsang, Ang Nan Gu, Teresa S.M. Tsang, Purang Abolmaesumi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsStenosisMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aortic stenosis (AS) is characterized by restricted motion and calcification of the aortic valve and is the deadliest valvular cardiac disease. Assessment of AS severity is typically done by expert cardiologists using Doppler measurements of valvular flow from echocardiography. However, this limits the assessment of AS to hospitals staffed with experts to provide comprehensive echocardiography service. As accurate Doppler acquisition requires significant clinical training, in this paper, we present a deep learning framework to determine the feasibility of AS detection and severity classification based only on two-dimensional echocardiographic data. We demonstrate that our proposed spatio-temporal architecture effectively and efficiently combines both anatomical features and motion of the aortic valve for AS severity classification. Our model can process cardiac echo cine series of varying length and can identify, without explicit supervision, the frames that are most informative towards the AS diagnosis. We present an empirical study on how the model learns phases of the heart cycle without any supervision and frame-level annotations. Our architecture outperforms state-of-the-art results on a private and a public dataset, achieving 95.2% and 91.5% in AS detection, and 78.1% and 83.8% in AS severity classification on the private and public datasets, respectively. Notably, due to the lack of a large public video dataset for AS, we made slight adjustments to our architecture for the public dataset. Furthermore, our method addresses common problems in training deep networks with clinical ultrasound data, such as a low signal-to-noise ratio and frequently uninformative frames. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/neda77aa/FTC.git.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207