CRAPS: Chromosomal-Repair-Assisted Pathway Shuffling in Yeast
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fundamental challenge of metabolic engineering involves assembling and screening vast combinations of orthologous enzymes across a multistep biochemical pathway. Current pathway assembly workflows involve combining genetic parts ex vivo and assembling one pathway configuration per tube or well. Here, we present CRAPS, C hromosomal- R epair- A ssisted P athway S huffling, an in vivo pathway engineering technique that enables the self-assembly of one pathway configuration per cell. CRAPS leverages the yeast chromosomal repair pathway and utilizes a pool of inactive, chromosomally integrated orthologous gene variants corresponding to a target multistep pathway. Supplying gRNAs to the CRAPS host activates the expression of one gene variant per pathway step, resulting in a unique pathway configuration in each cell. We deployed CRAPS to build more than 1000 theoretical combinations of a four-step carotenoid biosynthesis network. Sampling the CRAPS pathway space yielded strains with distinct color phenotypes and carotenoid product profiles. We anticipate that CRAPS will expedite strain engineering campaigns by enabling the generation and sampling of vast biochemical spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it