MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385858867 · doi:10.5515/kjkiees.2023.34.7.534

Transmission Loss between Buildings in the e-Um5G 4.7 GHz Band: Measurements and Analysis

2023· article· en· W4385858867 on OpenAlexaff
Won Jang, Dong‐Woo Kim, Byung‐Lok Cho, Soon‐Soo Oh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersChosun University
KeywordsTransmitterTransmission (telecommunications)Transmission lossSoftware deploymentTelecommunicationsFrequency bandElectrical engineeringRadio spectrumData transmissionComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A demand-based deployment strategy has been recently proposed for e-Um5G in the industrial market. This study measured the transmission loss between buildings at a frequency of 4.7 GHz to initiate small cell deployment in certain areas. A local average apparatus was utilized to remove fading effects, and data were acquired at discrete points one or two meters apart. The transmission losses for buildings 39 m and 95 m from the transmitter were 56.6 dB and 69.1 dB, respectively, excluding free-space loss. The transmission loss was found to be sensitive to building structure and transmitter location, as the loss for a building 39 m away decreased to 49.5 dB when the transmitter was moved closer to the building entrance. The measured results were analyzed in terms of the ITU-R SG3 (International Telecommunication Union-Radiocommunication Sector, Study Group 3) definition of building entry loss and can be used for frequency sharing and building-level small cell deployment in the e-Um5G frequency band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and ScienceSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207