MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385861544 · doi:10.59962/9780774853149-002

Preface

2007· book-chapter· en· W4385861544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is addressed to the era immediately following the Second World War.At the time, few people in Saskatchewan, or anywhere else for that matter, knew much about the Aboriginal community.For most, the Native was a somewhat faceless and enigmatic character described largely in negative and stereotypical terms.Only seldom did anyone fully appreciate the distinctions that defined groupings within Native society, and, initially at least, this ignorance was as true of the CCF government of Tommy Douglas as it had been of previous provincial administrations.Part of the problem concerning Aboriginal terminology -then and now -is that superimposed on both the shared and distinctive features of the various components of the Native community were artificial and legalistic definitions, ascribed by distant federal officials more interested in administering Indian Affairs programs than in recognizing the cultural realities of Native life.As a result, local politicians, bureaucrats, and the general public rarely understood the legal and social niceties associated with the terms 'Indian' or 'Metis' and often confused them.Hence, in the interest of clarifying terminology found in this book, it is necessary to provide some definitions.The term 'white' has been adopted in reference to everyone other than Native people.In itself, it is not a precise word in that it fails to acknowledge peoples of various ethnic backgrounds and skin colours; nevertheless, it has been employed here out of deference to the currency the term has achieved in popular usage and as a matter of convenience.It can be equated with the expression 'non-Native' and is used interchangeably with the phrase 'Euro-Canadian/ which is equally imprecise.As unsatisfactory as the term 'white' may be, it should be recognized that virtually all existing terminology attempting to portray the wider society accurately is problematic.As the title of this book implies, 'Native' is the term generally used to describe the subject of the study.It is true that some Native people today

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6080.411

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→