Bibliographic record
Abstract
T his is a family history about members of a minority community that has enjoyed remarkable success despite weathering decades of social and legal discrimination.It has taken fifty years and several contributors to bring this book to its present form.And it would not exist had the second generation -the children of immigrant parents -not realized that they had a story to tell and worked to preserve it.The primary locales are British Columbia and Punjab, places of dramatic contrast in climate, topography, flora, fauna, culture, tradition, and history, and yet linked in the lives of immigrants and the relatives they left behind.The family's background is Sikh, which means that it has belonged to a distinctive and visible minority both in India and in Canada.Its story is about change, challenge, trauma, foresight, confidence, and achievement in two countries that are half a world apart.This is not a typical Sikh family -if such a thing exists -but it is a family whose lives and actions reflected and affected what happened in their expatriate world as well as their ancestral home.The surname, as it appears in print, tells us something.When writing in English the family spells it as Siddoo, although the common English version is Sidhu.Kapoor Singh Siddoo, the family's first immigrant to Canada, changed the spelling at the beginning of the First World War after he had been in North America for nearly eight years.He did so because he reasoned that it would help English speakers to get the pronunciation right; and he was being pragmatic in a way that was entirely consistent with his approach to life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".