MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385867266 · doi:10.59962/9780774854559-002

Preface

2007· book-chapter· en· W4385867266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN THE SUMMER OF 1935, deep in the Yukon's Sixtymile mining district, a young Danish immigrant unpacked the family belongings and set about creating a home out of a tiny mining cabin.Only a few weeks earlier, this woman had given birth in Whitehorse.While she, her four-year-old daughter, and the new baby rested for the coming trip, her husband and two mining partners had built a sixteen-foot canoe that would take them some 300 miles down the Yukon River to the Sixtymile district.When the party set out the baby was twelve days old.This little 'bush baby,' as they called my father, was diapered with old flannels and moss from the nearby creeks and put outside in a packing crate to prevent jaundice.Over and over, I have asked my grandmother to tell me stories of her incredible journey from urban, middle-class Denmark to the poverty and hardships of northern Canadian bush life.The same woman who once played piano in the concert halls of Copenhagen relates each story with a shrug that indicates her travails were nothing special.'We did what we had to do,' she says.Growing up with all the conveniences of North American life, I found it hard to imagine the conditions under which my grandparents lived, worked, and raised their children.Even though very little had changed in the operation of a small family mining claim in the Yukon since the Klondike gold rush forty years earlier, my grandmother does not look back on her years on the Sixtymile as a period of drudgery.She cared for her growing family as well as for her husband's two mining partners under what could only be described as very rudimentary conditions.During the long dark winters she performed the laborious tasks of cooking and washing by kerosene lamp and candle light.To wash children, clothing, and dishes, she hauled and melted endless buckets of ice and snow.Where the wind blew the snow in, she chinked and re-chinked the mud and moss between the logs in the cabin walls.Her years on the Sixtymile were some of the happiest in her marriage.Together, my grandparents Bob and Elly Porsild built a future for themselves in the Yukon.Bob was also a Dane, and although a scientist by X

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6230.430

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→