MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385867610 · doi:10.59962/9780774850513-008

Women’s Training and Equity on the Hibernia Construction Project

2007· book-chapter· en· W4385867610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Hart, Mark Shrimpton

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Training (meteorology)Political scienceGeographyMeteorologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the Hibernia offshore oilWeld was one of the largest construction projects in Canadian history.It required expenditures of over Wve billion dollars and was of great signiWcance to the economy of Canada and, in particular, Newfoundland and Labrador.Work developing the Bull Arm construction site, 140 kilometres west of St. John's, started in late 1990.This was where the massive concrete base of the production platform and some of the modules and assemblies for the topsides (the drilling, processing, and accommodations complex that sits on the base) were built, and where the topsides were assembled and mated with the base.The project employed, at peak, nearly 7,000 people, most of them at the construction site.Work at the site ended in the summer of 1997, with the platform being towed out to the oilWeld shortly after.The project would not have proceeded but for major Wnancial support by the federal and provincial governments.The former committed to pay 25 percent of the construction costs to a total of $1.04 billion and provide loan guarantees for 40 percent of these costs to a maximum of $1.66 billion.The main motivation for this was spelled out by the senior federal representative at the 1990 signing ceremony: "The signiWcant Wnancial commitment by the federal government to make Hibernia happen is a clear demonstration of our determination to overcome regional disparities in Atlantic Canada."Given the size of the project and the levels of government involvement, it is not surprising that the project was used as a test-bed for initiatives in the area of public policy.These included training, hiring, accommodation, and other policies and programs designed to encourage the employment of women in both traditional and male-dominated occupations at the construction site.However, the project was a very challenging environment for such initiatives, bringing together, as it did, the cultures of the oil and construction industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks→Same topicLabor Movements and Unions→French-language works237,207→