Bibliographic record
Abstract
3.4 Gini coefficient, disposable income: census families, 1992-2000 5.1 Consumption by birth cohort and year 5.2 Inequality of consumption by birth cohort and year 5.3 Age-consumption profiles by birth cohort 5.4 Age-inequality profiles by birth cohort 6.1 Annual number of hours worked per person 6.2 Differences in tastes and money income inequality 6.3 Average working hours in Canada compared to other countries, 1994-95 8.1 Mean disposable household equivalent income: ratios of top to bottom decile, fifth to bottom decile, Canada, 1973-97 8.2 Distribution of children by equivalent income deciles: all children, Canada, 1973, 1985, 1997 8.3 Distribution of children by equivalent income deciles: two parents, one child familes, Canada, 1973Canada, , 1985Canada, , 1997 8.4 8.4 Distribution of children by equivalent income deciles: two parents, three children families, Canada, 1973Canada, , 1985Canada, , 1997 8.5 Distribution of children by equivalent income deciles: families with mothers under age 25, Canada, 197325, Canada, , 198525, Canada, , 1997 8.6 Distribution of children by equivalent income deciles: single-mother families, Canada 1973Canada , 1985Canada , 1997 x ......
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".