Bibliographic record
Abstract
Janine Stingel, From Father to Son: Canadian Jewry's Response to the Alberta Social Credit Party and the Reform Party of Canada This article examines the response of the Canadian Jewish Congress to the anti-Semitic propaganda within the Social Credit movement in Alberta under Ernest Manning in the 1940s, and its response to the Reform Party of Canada's right-wing agenda and incidents of intolerance under his son, Preston Manning, in the 1990s.The article discusses how the national representative organization for Canadian Jewry evolved and matured in the postwar period so that its passive, ineffective approach to Social Credit's intolerance was replaced by an unequivocal and public questioning of the Reform Party's agenda.It argues that Preston Manning learned from his father's errors regarding anti-Semitism within populist parties, and resolved that his party would not fall prey to such intolerance.Similarly, the Canadian Jewish Congress was determined to confront the Reform Party in a manner which it had been unable to muster against Social Credit in the 1940s.Janine Stingel, Du père au fils : la réaction juive au Parti du Crédit social albertain et au Parti de la Réforme canadien Cet article se propose d'étudier la réaction du Congrès juif canadien à la propagande antisémite diffusée au cours des
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.605 | 0.456 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".