MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385894319 · doi:10.23967/marine.2023.039

Performance and near-wake characteristics of a vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbine under a turbulent inflow and free-surface

2023· article· en· W4385894319 on OpenAlexaff
A. Bayram, M. Dhalwala, Peter Oshkai, Artem Korobenko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflowWakeTurbulenceMarine engineeringTurbineGeologyAerospace engineeringFree surfaceMechanicsEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we investigate the performance and near-wake characteristics of a full-scale vertical-axis tidal turbine under a uniform inflow and turbulent inflow.The governing equations are the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations expressed within an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) framework.The finite-element based variational multiscale (VMS) formulation, augmented with a weakly imposed Dirichlet boundary condition at no-slip surfaces, is used.A turbulent inflow is prescribed using a synthetic turbulence generation (STG) method referred to as Smirnov's random flow generation and the near-wake characteristics are studied using a multi-domain method.While the performance of the turbine slightly reduced under a turbulent inflow compared to a uniform inflow, there was a negligible difference in its performance between the two turbulent inflow conditions.A turbulent inflow also resulted in large fluctuations of the instantaneous power coefficient which has important implications for the fatigue life of certain components.Lastly, the wake recovery was notably improved under a turbulent inflow suggesting that a shorter streamwise inter-device spacing may be acceptable in highly turbulent tidal sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207