Feet and legs malformation in Nellore cattle: genetic analysis and prioritization of GWAS results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beef cattle affected by feet and legs malformations (FLM) cannot perform their productive and reproductive functions satisfactorily, resulting in significant economic losses. Accelerated weight gain in young animals due to increased fat deposition can lead to ligaments, tendon and joint strain and promote gene expression patterns that lead to changes in the normal architecture of the feet and legs. The possible correlated response in the FLM due to yearling weight (YW) selection suggest that this second trait could be used as an indirect selection criterion. Therefore, FLM breeding values and the genetic correlation between FLM and yearling weight (YW) were estimated for 295,031 Nellore animals by fitting a linear-threshold model in a Bayesian approach. A genome-wide association study was performed to identify genomic windows and positional candidate genes associated with FLM. The effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on FLM phenotypes (affected or unaffected) were estimated using the weighted single-step genomic BLUP method, based on genotypes of 12,537 animals for 461,057 SNPs. Twelve non-overlapping windows of 20 adjacent SNPs explaining more than 1% of the additive genetic variance were selected for candidate gene annotation. Functional and gene prioritization analysis of candidate genes identified six genes ( ATG7 , EXT1 , ITGA1 , PPARD , SCUBE3 , and SHOX ) that may play a role in FLM expression due to their known role in skeletal muscle development, aberrant bone growth, lipid metabolism, intramuscular fat deposition and skeletogenesis. Identifying genes linked to foot and leg malformations enables selective breeding for healthier herds by reducing the occurrence of these conditions. Genetic markers can be used to develop tests that identify carriers of these mutations, assisting breeders in making informed breeding decisions to minimize the incidence of malformations in future generations, resulting in greater productivity and animal welfare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".