Effect of reduced crude protein diets supplemented with free limiting amino acids on body weight, carcass yield, and breast meat quality in broiler chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of reducing dietary crude protein (CP) content in the grower and finisher diets of broiler chickens on breast meat quality, muscle protein functionality, growth, carcass yield, and meat yield. To achieve this, a total of 1,269 one-day-old male Ross 308 chicks were fed 1 of 3 diets replicated 9 times each in a randomized complete block design with 9 blocks. The diets included a control (20.4% and 19.5% CP in the grower and finisher phase, respectively), a diet with a 1.5% reduction (CP-1.5%) and a diet with a 3.0% reduction (CP-3.0%) in CP content in both the grower and finisher phases. At the end of the experiment, the reduced-CP diets had no impact on body weight, feed intake, or feed conversion ratio. However, reduced-CP diet resulted in reduced (P < 0.001) total nitrogen intake (-7.46 and -11.94% in CP-1.5% and CP-3.0%, respectively). Breast meat quality was assessed (n = 36 birds/group), and the experimental diets were associated with a slightly increased (P = 0.07) ultimate pH (5.75, 5.79, and 5.81 for the control, CP-1.5%, and CP-3.0%, respectively). Breast fillets from the CP-1.5% and CP-3.0% groups had lower yellowness (b*, P < 0.001) and lower cooking loss (CL, P < 0.001) values than the control. Moreover, the solubility, emulsion activity, and stability indices of the sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar fractions of muscle proteins were not influenced by the diets. CP-1.5% and CP-3.0% diets were associated with an increased (P < 0.001) breast yield (18.39, 19.21, and 19.61% for the control, CP-1.5%, and CP-3.0%, respectively) while leg yield remained unchanged. Additionally, breast meat nutritional properties including protein and lipid contents were not impacted by the experimental diets. In conclusion, the CP content in the grower and finisher diets of broiler chickens can be reduced by as much as 3.0% without detrimental effects on performance or on meat quality as long as birds' amino acid requirements are adequately met.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".