Physical Activity Promotion Among Individuals With Tetralogy of Fallot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the general population, the most cited barriers to physical activity (PA) are time, energy, and motivation. Consequently, despite the significant contribution of PA to health and well-being, many individuals are insufficiently active. Physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyles increase the risk of acquired cardiometabolic disease, a risk that may complicate and is compounded by the anatomic and physiologic features inherent in the patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). Individuals with ToF commonly present with reduced exercise capacity and PA levels. In light of historically PA restrictive management of their heart disease, known reductions in exercise capacity among individuals with ToF are combined with psychosocial barriers to their participation, potentially establishing a cycle of further detraining, inactivity, and disease progression/health decline. To this end, children and young adults with ToF are known to have reduced self-efficacy towards PA, defined as their confidence in their ability to participate. In this review, we apply self-efficacy as an overarching mediator of PA participation and explore trends and determinants of PA participation among individuals with ToF and its subsequent impact on exercise capacity, disease risk, and health-related quality of life. We outline the rationale and strategies aimed at improving PA in children and adults with ToF and highlight current knowledge gaps and future directions in the promotion of PA in the population with ToF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".