Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan terhadap Kepuasan Pelaksanaan Program MBKM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT
 Service quality and student satisfaction are important aspects of the strategy of higher education institutions in the competitive higher education market. One of the quality of higher education services that needs attention is the quality of service in the learning process. Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) is a program launched by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology as a service for students by providing opportunities for students to hone skills according to their interests and talents with various programs. The Faculty of Economics and Business UNB has organized the MBKM program since 2020/2021 with two programs, namely Student Exchange and KKNT. This study aims to determine the level of student satisfaction with the quality of service implementation of the MBKM program. This study uses census data, the analytical methods used multiple linear regression. Based on the results of t-test here are three variables that effect i.e. variable Tangibles, Reliability and Responsiveness while variable Assurance, Emphaty and Relevance does not affect the satisfaction of the implementation of the MBKM program. The result of this research was based on the F-test is the quality of service which consists of Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Emphaty, Assurance, and Relevance take effect simultaneously to satisfactions of the implementation of the MBKM program.
 
 Keywords : Service quality; Satisfaction; MBKM
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it