MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386009216

Anaphylaxis, successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation out of hospital

2014· article· en· W4386009216 on OpenAlexaff
Niković Vuk, Bulajić Ranka, Nenek Srđan

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsCape Breton Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiopulmonary resuscitationAnaphylaxisMedicineResuscitationIntensive care medicineAnesthesiaAllergyImmunology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that is rapid in onset and may cause death. Coronary artery spasm may occur with subsequent myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, or cardiac arrest. Those with underlying coronary disease are at greater risk of cardiac effects from anaphylaxis. The coronary spasm is related to the presence of histamine-releasing cells in the heart. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency procedure for manually preserving brain function until further measures to restore spontaneous blood circulation and breathing in a person who is in cardiac arrest. It is indicated in those who are unresponsive with no breathing or abnormal breathing, for example, agonal respirations. CASE REPORT: This is a case report of a 56 years old female with anaphylactic shock after a successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) . After the call our team was send to the patient's household. The patient was on the floor, unconscious. She was cyanotic, with very weak respiratory effort and decrease respiratory rate. As per patient's husband present at the scene , the patient has history of COPD. She took Ibuprofen(tablet400 mg). Her conditon was deteriorating . She was not breathing, and the pulse was not palplable. Cardiac monitor was showing asystoly. CPR was started iv line was placed. After 2 series of compression the patient was intubated. CPR was continued and after 15 minutes the pulse was palpable and the patient was transferred to hospital- Clinical Ceneter for futher investigation and treatment. During the transport her GCS was improving but patient was still unconsciousness. During hospitalization underwent a complete diagnostic and she was treated with H2 blockers, low molecular weight heparin, bronchodilatators and, xanthine therapy. She was discharged after 7 days of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The sooner CPR is started the better is the outcome. In the first 3 minutes the chance of return of spontaneous circulation is 75%. After 4 minutes is 40%. After 5 minutes the chance of return of spontaneous circulation is minimal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research→French-language works237,207→