MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386020559 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2495

Towards 21-cm intensity mapping at <i>z</i> = 2.28 with uGMRT using the tapered gridded estimator – III. Foreground removal

2023· article· en· W4386020559 on OpenAlexaff
Khandakar Md Asif Elahi, Somnath Bharadwaj, Srijita Pal, Abhik Ghosh, Sk. Saiyad Ali, Samir Choudhuri, Arnab Chakraborty, Abhirup Datta, Nirupam Roy, Madhurima Choudhury, Prasun Dutta

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology, Government of West BengalDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaScience and Engineering Research BoardIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurTata Institute of Fundamental Research
KeywordsPhysicsGiant Metrewave Radio TelescopeOmegaAstrophysicsBrightness temperatureSpectral densityIntensity (physics)BrightnessAtomic physicsOpticsGalaxyRadio galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Neutral hydrogen (${\rm H\, \small {I}}$) 21-cm intensity mapping (IM) is a promising probe of the large-scale structures in the Universe. However, a few orders of magnitude brighter foregrounds obscure the IM signal. Here, we use the tapered gridded estimator to estimate the multifrequency angular power spectrum Cℓ(Δν) from a $24.4\hbox{-} \rm {MHz}$ bandwidth upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope Band 3 data at $432.8\ \rm {MHz}$. In Cℓ(Δν) foregrounds remain correlated across the entire Δν range, whereas the 21-cm signal is localized within Δν ≤ [Δν] (typically, 0.5–1 MHz). Assuming the range Δν &amp;gt; [Δν] to have minimal 21-cm signal, we use Cℓ(Δν) in this range to model the foregrounds. This foreground model is extrapolated to Δν ≤ [Δν], and subtracted from the measured Cℓ(Δν). The residual [Cℓ(Δν)]res in the range Δν ≤ [Δν] is used to constrain the 21-cm signal, compensating for the signal loss from foreground subtraction. [Cℓ(Δν)]res is found to be noise-dominated without any trace of foregrounds. Using [Cℓ(Δν)]res, we constrain the 21-cm brightness temperature fluctuations Δ2(k), and obtain the 2σ upper limit $\Delta _{\rm UL}^2(k)\le (18.07)^2\ \rm {mK^2}$ at $k=0.247\ \rm {Mpc}^{-1}$. We further obtain the 2σ upper limit $[\Omega _{{\rm H\, \small {I}}}b_{{\rm H\, \small {I}}}]_{\rm UL}\le 0.022$, where $\Omega _{{\rm H\, \small {I}}}$ and $b_{{\rm H\, \small {I}}}$ are the comoving ${\rm H\, \small {I}}$ density and bias parameters, respectively. Although the upper limit is nearly 10 times larger than the expected 21-cm signal, it is 3 times tighter over previous works using foreground avoidance on the same data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207