MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386023412 · doi:10.1101/2023.08.14.23293991

SARS-CoV-2 variants Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 significantly escape T cell recognition in solid organ transplant recipients vaccinated against the ancestral strain

2023· preprint· en· W4386023412 on OpenAlexafffund
Torin Halvorson, Sabine Ivison, Qing Huang, Gale Ladua, Demitra M. Yotis, Dhiraj Mannar, Sriram Subramaniam, Victor H. Ferreira, Deepali Kumar, Sara Belga, Megan K. Levings

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsTranslational Research in OncologyBC Children's HospitalUniversity Health NetworkVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaBC Children's HospitalAstraZeneca
KeywordsImmunologyAntibodyVaccinationT cellAntigenCD8Immune systemBiologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Immune-suppressed solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) display impaired humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccination, but T cell responses are incompletely understood. The highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 variants Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 escape neutralization by antibodies induced by vaccination or infection with earlier strains, but T cell recognition of these lineages in SOTRs is unclear. Methods We characterized Spike-specific T cell responses to ancestral SARS-CoV-2, Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 peptides in a prospective study of kidney, lung and liver transplant recipients (n = 42) throughout a three- or four-dose ancestral Spike mRNA vaccination schedule. Using an optimized activation-induced marker assay, we quantified circulating Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells based on antigen-stimulated expression of CD134, CD69, CD25, CD137 and/or CD107a. Results Vaccination strongly induced SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, including BA.4/5- and XBB.1.5-reactive T cells, which remained detectable over time and further increased following a fourth dose. However, responses to Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 were significantly lower in magnitude compared to ancestral strain responses. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cell frequencies correlated with anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody titres, with post-second dose T cell responses predicting subsequent antibody responses. Patients receiving prednisone, lung transplant recipients and older adults displayed weaker responses. Conclusions Ancestral strain vaccination stimulates BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5-cross-reactive T cells in SOTRs, but responses to these variants are diminished. Antigen-specific T cells can predict future antibody responses and identify vaccine responses in seronegative individuals. Our data support monitoring both humoral and cellular immunity in SOTRs to track effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against emerging variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→