MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386031169 · doi:10.1680/jgein.23.00041

Antioxidant-stabilizer depletion of 4 HDPE geomembranes with high HP-OIT in MSW leachate

2023· article· en· W4386031169 on OpenAlexaff
M.A. Clinton, R. Kerry Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosynthetics International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomembraneHigh-density polyethyleneLeachatePolyethyleneStabilizer (aeronautics)Materials scienceAntioxidantLimitingComposite materialChemistryEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The antioxidant-stabilizer depletion of four 1.5-mm HDPE geomembranes from the same manufacturer each with a different resin and additive package is examined in air and a synthetic municipal solid waste leachate at a range of temperatures (40–95°C) for 7.5 years. Two were formulated for high temperatures and used polyethylene of raised temperature resistance (PE-RT) resins while two used more conventional HDPE geomembrane formulations. The depletion of protective antioxidants and stabilizers was monitored using standard and high-pressure oxidative induction time (OIT) tests and the notably different depletion times for both OIT tests implied they were detecting different groups of AO-S. Although both PE-RT GMBs showed significantly slower AO-S depletion at 85°C in air compared to the conventional PE GMBs, only one PE-RT GMB maintained this status in 85°C leachate, highlighting the limitation of air aging tests (and importance of fluid immersion tests). The importance of running immersion tests long enough to reveal the residual HP-OIT value is stressed. The roles of stabilizer mobility and solubility in polyethylene and their suspected involvement in residual HP-OIT behavior are also illustrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosynthetics InternationalSame topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207