MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Index

2023· paratext· en· W4386040911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

between digital policies and objective of banking, 71-73 Banswara Village, case study of, 27 Behavioural social capital, 27 Bharat Bill Payment system, 108 BHIM (mobile application-based fund transfer system), 93-94, 96-97, 108 BOLT, 48 Bombay Plan (1944), 2-3 Bombay stock exchange digitisation of, 48 index, 48 Borrowers, 123 Borrowings from self-help groups, 132-133 Bridging capital, 34 British rule, 9 Bruntland commission, The (1987), 154 Bulk Payment system, 101-102 Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPR&D), 157 Business decision, issue with, 165-166 Business email impostors, 141 Call Money, 55 Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), 25 Capacity building importance of, 19 initiatives, 5-7 Capital formation, 50 metaphor of, 30-31 Cash, 94 transfers, 162-163 Cash Benefit scheme, 162-163 Cash-in cash-out (CICO), 114 Cashless economy, 96-97 challenges to, 114-116 digital capital, 115-116 of India, 93-94 social perspective, 93-94 Cashless financial systems benefits of financial inclusion and digitization, 116-117 cashless economy of India, 93-94 challenges to cashless economy, 114-116 digital money, 96-97 e-Governance in India, 98-99 financial inclusion and consumer data protection, 114 Fintech Companies, 113-114 Indian stack, 101-102 nine pillars of Digital India, 99-101 Payment Banks in India, 112-113 policy ecosystem, 108 reforming e-government through technology, 102-108 transforming India's digital payment landscape, 108-112 vision of digital India, 97-98 Casteism, 7-8 Central Bank of India, The, 60, 114 Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS), 156 Central sector schemes, 127-128 Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), 130 Centre for Water Resources Development and Management (CWRDM), 153-154 Certificate of deposits, 55, 65, 143-144, 184, 187 Choonthumani (earrings of Paniya tribe), 33-34 Circular flow of money in economy, 50-51 Climate Change, 152-154 initiatives for, 155 Climate refugees, 153-154 Cluster approach, 42 Cognitive social capital, 27 Collateral-free lending system, 132-133

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.709

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207