MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386055512 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2023-0168

A data driven real-time perception method of rock condition in TBM construction

2023· article· en· W4386055512 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaPeople's Government of Jilin ProvinceChina Railway
KeywordsRock mass classificationIdentification (biology)Data miningComputer scienceIndex (typography)StatisticsGeotechnical engineeringMining engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In tunnel boring machine (TBM) construction, the presence of collapsible rock mass (CRM) can lead to accidents such as collapse and jamming. This study presents a novel CRM early warning strategy based on real-time TBM rock fragmentation data to improve safety and efficiency in CRM conditions. The strategy includes a qualitative classification model and a quantitative probability model for CRM identification. The results indicate that the distribution dissimilarity index β effectively reflect the significance of variables across CRM and non-CRM datasets. Various parameters, including TPI, FPI, WR, and AF, show discriminatory ability between CRM and non-CRM samples. In particular, the CRM-weighted index, which combines the strengths of the individual indices, achieves a distributional dissimilarity index of 1.05, significantly higher than any of the individual indices. The qualitative classification model proves effective in identifying samples from collapse areas, demonstrating ability to identify samples located in adverse geological condition. The quantitative model shows that the probability of CRM is generally higher in adverse geological area samples, particularly in zones where collapse has occurred, with a CRM probability is approaching 1. The proposed strategy provides accurate early warnings to prevent collapse accidents and represents a practical approach to improving the safety and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it