Appliances Operation Modes Identification Using States Clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing cost, energy demand, and environmental issues have led many researchers to find approaches for energy monitoring, and hence energy conservation. The emerging technologies of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Machine Learning (ML) deliver techniques that have the potential to conserve energy and improve the utilization of energy consumption efficiently. Smart Home Energy Management Systems (SHEMSs) have the potential to contribute to energy conservation through the application of Demand Response (DR) in the residential sector. In this paper, the aPpliances opeRation mOdes idenTification using statEs ClusTering (PROTECT) is proposed, a SHEMS analytical component that utilizes the sensed residential disaggregated power consumption in supporting DR by providing consumers with the opportunity to select lighter Appliance Operation Modes (AOMs). The states of an appliance’s Single Usage Profile (SUP) are extracted and reformed into features in terms of clusters of states. These features are then used to identify the AOM used in every occurrence using K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). AOM identification is considered a basis for many potential smart DR applications within SHEMS, contributing to up to 78% energy reduction for some appliances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".