MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An On-Line Selective Harmonic Elimination Modulation Scheme for High-Power Medium-Voltage Current Source Converters

2023· article· en· W4386066685 on OpenAlexaff
Martti Muzyka, Qiang Wei, Zijian Wang, Navid R. Zargari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)Lakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationModulation indexHarmonicsConvertersElectronic engineeringModulation (music)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)HarmonicAmplitude modulationPulse-amplitude modulationController (irrigation)AmplitudePower (physics)Line (geometry)Current sourceVoltageEngineeringFrequency modulationElectrical engineeringPulse (music)PhysicsMathematicsRadio frequencyTelecommunicationsAcousticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In high-power, medium-voltage (MV) pulse width modulated (PWM) current source converter (CSC) based drives, selective harmonic elimination (SHE) configured with amplitude modulation index control is commonly used to modulate the front-end PWM current source rectifier (CSR), as it possesses the ability to eliminate problematic low-order harmonics, while also offering full control over the DC-link current. To practically implement this variant of SHE, the switching angles solved for at discrete values of the amplitude modulation index, across its full operating range, must be pre-computed off-line, and then stored within a look-up table on the digital controller. As a result of this off-line implementation, conventional SHE configured with amplitude modulation index control features poor dynamic performance and requires the use of a large, memory-exhaustive look-up table. This paper presents an on-line SHE scheme that models each of the necessary independent switching angles as polynomial functions of the amplitude modulation index using curve-fitting techniques. This method of implementation allows for the switching angles to be accurately recomputed in real-time, thus offering improved dynamic performance and eliminating the need for a large look-up table. Additionally, the inherent benefits of conventional SHE are retained. Experimental verification proving the effectiveness of the proposed on-line SHE scheme is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207