MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Aχon: IoT Attribute-based dynamic connector For Emergency Applications

2023· article· en· W4386066999 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ghandour, Hamid Mcheick, Mohamed Dbouk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceCable glandEmergency responseComputer securityTelecommunicationsMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm-based applications are becoming essential in our daily lives in smart houses, medical equipment, agriculture, industries, smart cities, and other fields. While building an IoT system, architects and developers use distributed architectures where the system is a set of interoperated components by connectors. Different limitations incur the development of a connector in IoT devices, i.e., connectivity and internal resources. The reason is that each service needs an exclusive allocation of the device’s storage, memory, and processing power which makes running multiple services on the same device cumbersome. In this research, we design a generic "Software Connector" that aims to optimize the use of the device’s resources. The proposed connector will dynamically allocate and deallocate necessary resources at runtime when receiving a message, and it will adapt its behavior based on a set of attributes obtained from the local database and the incoming messages. The connector improves messages’ reliability by following the broadcast-default function, especially in case of network failure. We applied the proposed approach to an "Emergency Response System" with different IoT device types, describing an emergency scenario to validate the proposed approach. More ever, to make the proposed connector more accessible for developers to extend its functionalities and increase the number of supported platforms, we will commit it to an online repository.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing→French-language works237,207→