MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386067764 · doi:10.11159/htff23.159

Jet Vectoring by Suction Flows on Surface of Circular Cylinder

2023· article· en· W4386067764 on OpenAlex
Kaito Suzuki, Minoru Nakagawa, Koichi Nishibe, Donghyuk Kang, Kotaro SATO

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCylinderJet (fluid)SuctionMechanicsPhysicsSurface (topology)OpticsSupercavitationThrust vectoringMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringGeometryMeteorologyNozzleMathematicsCavitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For indirect blowing in thermal management or ductless ventilation, it is necessary to establish a technique for rapid deflection of the jet stream.Jet vectoring technique has been studied in the past, and recently, the interest in fluidic thrust vectoring, which controls the direction of the jet flow without changing the geometry, has considerably increased.Maison et al. [1] reported that the thrust vector coefficient in the deflection of the primary jet depends on the momentum ratio of the primary and secondary jets.When the jet deflection angle is adjusted by the momentum ratio, it is classified into three regions: dead zone, controllable region, and saturated region.Later, Kobayashi et al. [2] and Zhang et al. [3] reported that the jet deflection angle can not only be adjusted by the momentum ratio but also by the dimensionless frequency using a synthetic jet and hybrid synthetic jet as the secondary jet, respectively.However, in most previous studies, the jet deflection was controlled by a single slot for the secondary flow, and the maximum deflection angle achieved was less than 90, indicating that the discussion of the maximum deflection angle was not sufficient.In this study, a fluidic thrust vectoring method, with multiple slots on a Coanda surface, was proposed to expand the jet deflection angle.Five secondary slots for steady suction were installed on the Coanda surface at 30 intervals to control the direction of the primary jet.The Coanda surface radius ( = 2.5 10 -2 m), primary jet slot width ( 1 = 1.0 10 -2 m), secondary jet slot width ( 2 = 2.0 10 -3 m), primary jet flow velocity ( 1 = 10 m s ), and secondary jet flow velocity ( 2 = -5 m s ) were kept constant, and the combination of secondary slots to be operated was investigated through numerical simulation, experimental flow visualization, and velocity distribution measurements.Numerical simulations were performed using the ANSYS Fluent 2021 R1 software (ANSYS Inc.).The experiments were conducted using a hot-wire anemometer (Smart CTA 720), I-type probe (KANOMAX 0251R-T5), parallel probe (KANOMAX 0247R-T5), and digital camera (Sony Corporation ZV-1).The results show that the suction from multiple slots on the Coanda surface reduced the pressure on the cylindrical surface and suppressed jet detachment, resulting in an extremely large jet deflection angle.Moreover, the direction of the primary jet could be controlled by changing the combination of the secondary slots to be operated.Conditions under which the maximum deflection angle reaches approximately 180 were found, and it was possible to control the direction of the primary jet by changing the combination of secondary jet slots, such as the first slot at = 30, second slot at = 60, and fourth slot at = 120 , on the cylindrical surface.Combinations of slots were also found for achieving minimum suction flow (approximate 30% of the primary jet flow) by skipping one slot at a time instead of sequentially operating the slots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it