MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386067770 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.032018

High-statistics measurement of antineutrino quasielasticlike scattering at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> 6 GeV on a hydrocarbon target

2023· article· lv· W4386067770 on OpenAlexaff
A. Bashyal, S. Akhter, Z. Ahmad Dar, F. Akbar, V. Ansari, M. V. Ascencio, M. Sajjad Athar, A. Bercellie, M. Betancourt, A. Bodek, J. L. Bonilla, A. Bravar, H. S. Budd, G. Cáceres, T. Cai, M. F. Carneiro, G. A. Díaz, J. Félix, L. Fields, A. Filkins, R. Fine, A. M. Gago, H. Gallagher, P. K. Gaur, S. M. Gilligan, R. Gran, E. Granados, D. A. Harris, S. Henry, C. Jena, S. Jena, J. Kleykamp, A. Klustová, M. Kordosky, D. Last, T. Le, A. Lozano, X.-G. Lu, E. Maher, S. Manly, W. A. Mann, C. Mauger, K. S. McFarland, A. M. McGowan, B. Messerly, J. Miller, Omar Moreno, J. G. Morfín, D. Naples, J. K. Nelson, C. Nguyen, A. Olivier, V. Paolone, G. N. Perdue, Komninos-John Plows, M. A. Ramírez, R. D. Ransome, H. Ray, D. Ruterbories, H. Schellman, C. J. Solano Salinas, Hang Su, M. Sultana, V. S. Syrotenko, E. Valencia, N. H. Vaughan, A. V. Waldron, C. Wret, B. Yaeggy, L. Zazueta

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoFermilabHigh Energy PhysicsComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaOffice of SciencePontificia Universidad Católica del PerúConsejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación TecnológicaUniversity of RochesterScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNarodowe Centrum NaukiDirección de Gestión de la Investigación, Universidad de AntofagastaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Science FoundationConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsMuonNeutrinoParticle physicsEnergy (signal processing)Nuclear physicsScatteringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present measurements of the cross section for antineutrino charged-current quasielasticlike scattering on hydrocarbon using the medium energy NuMI wide-band neutrino beam peaking at antineutrino energy $⟨{E}_{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}⟩\ensuremath{\sim}6\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. The measurements are presented as a function of the longitudinal momentum (${p}_{||}$) and transverse momentum (${p}_{T}$) of the final state muon. This work complements our previously reported high statistics measurement in the neutrino channel and extends the previous antineutrino measurement made in a low energy beam at $⟨{E}_{\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}⟩\ensuremath{\sim}3.5\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ out to ${p}_{T}$ of $2.5\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}/\mathrm{c}$. Current theoretical models do not completely describe the data in this previously unexplored high ${p}_{T}$ region. The single differential cross section as a function of four-momentum transfer (${Q}_{QE}^{2}$) now extends to $4\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$ with high statistics. The cross section as a function of ${Q}_{QE}^{2}$ shows that the tuned simulations developed by the MINERvA Collaboration that agreed well with the low energy beam measurements do not agree as well with the medium energy beam measurements. Newer neutrino interaction models such as the GENIE v3 tunes are better able to simulate the high ${Q}_{QE}^{2}$ region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicNeutrino Physics Research→French-language works237,207→