MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386067823 · doi:10.22331/q-2023-08-22-1089

Concatenation Schemes for Topological Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction

2023· article· en· W4386067823 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhaoyi Li, Isaac H. Kim, Patrick Hayden

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchArmy Research OfficeSimons Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmConcatenation (mathematics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate a family of fault-tolerant quantum error correction schemes based on the concatenation of small error detection or error correction codes with the three-dimensional cluster state. We propose fault-tolerant state preparation and decoding schemes that effectively convert every circuit-level error into an erasure error, leveraging the cluster state's high threshold against such errors. We find a set of codes for which such a conversion is possible, and study their performance against the standard circuit-level depolarizing model. Our best performing scheme, which is based on a concatenation with a classical code, improves the threshold by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mn>16.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&amp;#x0025;</mml:mi></mml:math> and decreases the spacetime overhead by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&amp;#x0025;</mml:mi></mml:math> compared to the scheme without concatenation, with each scheme subject to a physical error rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>&amp;#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> and achieving a logical error rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>&amp;#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantumSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207