MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386070393 · doi:10.3390/epigenomes7030019

Multiomics Data Analysis Identified CpG Sites That Mediate the Impact of Smoking on Cardiometabolic Traits

2023· article· en· W4386070393 on OpenAlexafffund
Majid Nikpay

Bibliographic record

VenueEpigenomes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsExpression quantitative trait lociCpG siteEpigenomeBiologyQuantitative trait locusGeneSNPDNA methylationGenome-wide association studyGenetic associationGeneticsBioinformaticsComputational biologyGene expressionSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the epigenome paths through which smoking contributes to cardiometabolic traits is important for downstream applications. In this study, an SNP-based analytical pipeline was used to integrate several publicly available datasets in order to identify CpG sites that mediate the impact of smoking on cardiometabolic traits and to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms. After applying stringent statistical criteria, 11 CpG sites were detected that showed significant association (p < 5 × 10−8) with cardiometabolic traits at both the discovery and replication stages. By integrating eQTL data, I found genes behind a number of these associations. cg05228408 was hypomethylated in smokers and contributed to higher blood pressure by lowering the expression of the CLCN6 gene. cg08639339 was hypermethylated in smokers and lowered the metabolic rate by increasing the expression of RAB29; furthermore, I noted TMEM120A mediated the impact of smoking-cg17325771 on LDL, and LTBP3 mediated the smoking-cg07029024 effect on heart rate. The pathway analysis identified processes through which the identified genes impact their traits. This study provides a list of CpG sites that mediates the impact of smoking on cardiometabolic traits and a framework to investigate the underlying molecular paths using publicly available data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpigenomesSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207