Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Blood Flow in CerebralMycotic Aneurysms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mycotic aneurysm is a serious medical condition that, if not treated promptly, can lead to life-threatening complications.The geometry of a cerebral mycotic aneurysm (CMA) is extremely intricate, and each anatomy is unique.Clinical imaging depicting the complicated architecture of the CMA include Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) and Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA).Analysing the hemodynamics inside the complex aneurysm is still challenging.Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of blood flow in mycotic aneurysms has emerged as a promising method for understanding the hemodynamic parameters that contribute to the formation and propagation of these aneurysms.Calculations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are used to explore the hemodynamic influences on flow characteristics, secondary flow patterns, and helicity in complex aneurysms.Aneurysm initiation and growth have been widely connected to hemodynamics-based wall shear stress (WSS).The relationship between the hemodynamics of aneurysm initiation and growth that leads to rupture is not entirely established in the context of patient-specific aneurysms.CFD-based studies in CMA are scarce, and the current work fills the gap by employing a patient-specific model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".