Jet Direction Control Using Active Switching Nozzle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many studies have been conducted on fluidic thrust vectoring, which uses a secondary flow to deflect a primary jet, instead of mechanical thrust vectoring including a variable exhaust nozzle, to improve maneuverability and maintainability by simplifying, downsizing, and reducing the weight of the entire thrust vectoring system In recent years, research has also begun on the utilization of synthetic or hybrid-synthetic jets as secondary flows for further increasing the deflection angle In addition, Mair et al. [3] proposed a novel fluidic valve with active switching using acoustic signals and a splitter; they determined the flow switching mechanism from experimental and numerical results. These technologies find applicability in not only aircraft development but also in a wide range of other fields, including heating, ventilation, and airconditioning systems. However, in the conventional methods, there is a dead zone where the deflection angle cannot be adjusted, and a technique to adjust the deflection angle precisely without a splitter, which is an issue in practical use, has not been established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".