Tube geometry controls protein cluster conformation and stability on the endoplasmic reticulum surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a cellular organelle that forms a cell-spanning network of tubes and sheets, is an important location of protein synthesis and folding. When the ER experiences sustained unfolded protein stress, IRE1 proteins embedded in the ER membrane activate and assemble into clusters as part of the unfolded protein response (UPR). We use kinetic Monte Carlo simulations to explore IRE1 clustering dynamics on the surface of ER tubes. While initially growing clusters are approximately round, once a cluster is sufficiently large a shorter interface length can be achieved by 'wrapping' around the ER tube. A wrapped cluster can grow without further interface length increases. Relative to wide tubes, narrower tubes enable cluster wrapping at smaller cluster sizes. Our simulations show that wrapped clusters on narrower tubes grow more rapidly, evaporate more slowly, and require a lower protein concentration to grow compared to equal-area round clusters on wider tubes. These results suggest that cluster wrapping, facilitated by narrower tubes, could be an important factor in the growth and stability of IRE1 clusters and thus impact the persistence of the UPR, connecting geometry to signaling behavior. This work is consistent with recent experimental observations of IRE1 clusters wrapped around narrow tubes in the ER network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".