MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386100805 · doi:10.51594/ijmer.v5i8.528

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AND ITS DETERMINANTS IN AFRICA: A QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH CONCERNING YOUNG CONSUMERS IN BRAZZAVILLE

2023· article· en· W4386100805 on OpenAlexaff
Emérence Oniangue Kouta, Ndiouma Ndour, Cloli Sacré Akouelamouai Atsamekou, Théophile Bindeouè Nassè, Joseph Félix Zogning

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Alcohol consumptionEnvironmental healthLogistic regressionOrdered logitPsychologyAlcoholBusinessSocioeconomicsDemographic economicsEconomicsMedicineSociologySocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alcohol consumption in the Republic of Congo is increasingly becoming a social phenomenon that arouses joy, envy, interest and leisure among young people that are difficult to explain and understand a priori. The objective of this study is to identify the determining factors of alcohol consumption among young people in Brazzaville. A total of 445 young respondents (men and women aged 15 to 35) were surveyed. The data is analyzed using a Logit model that shows that socio-economic factors and marketing-related aspects are the main determinants that influence the increase in alcohol consumption among the youth in Brazzaville. Youth with an income, consume as many times as they want because they get pocket money from their parents, and because they have odd jobs. It is recommended that governmental authorities should put some sustainable policies to reduce the excessive alcohol intake by youth. Keywords: Alcohol Consumption, Alcohol, Juvenile Environment, Alcoholic Beverages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.383
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship ResearchSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207